www.aclu.org JOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTION DONATE ABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office

 

Join Us At:

August 15th, 2008 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg!RedditDeliciousFacebook

Texas’s DIVERT Court Saves Taxpayer Money, Keeps People Out of Prison

Earlier this year, the Pew Center for the States reported that more than 1 of every 100 American adults is in jail or prison. That totals approximately 2.3 million adults.

NPR reported today on one program that could help solve America’s huge incarceration problem. Texas sends many people to "DIVERT" Court, a system that pushes first-time, low-level non-violent offenders—especially those arrested for minor drug possession offenses—through rehab and treatment programs instead of the through the criminal justice system and into prison.

Texas has a prison population of 157,000, a number that’s expected to balloon in the next few years if it continues to incarcerate at its current rate. NPR reports:

Two studies by Southern Methodist University show that DIVERT Court cuts the recidivism rate by 68 percent over the regular Texas criminal justice courts. For every dollar spent on the court, $9 are saved in future criminal justice costs.

…The expanding prison population is a financial red stain spreading across the state’s books like the Andromeda Strain, [Texas State Rep. Jerry Madden (R-Plano), Chairman of the House Corrections Committee] says. Each new maximum security prison costs Texas taxpayers $300 million to build and $40 million a year to operate.

State officials estimate that unless changes are made, Texas will need 17,000 more prison beds just four years from now. Releasing prisoners on parole is politically untenable — which makes "diversion" an increasingly appealing way to avoid what’s looking like a $2 billion invoice.
You can’t argue with numbers like that. The DIVERT Court has been such a success that officials are hoping to expand it beyond first-time offenders. Jody Kent, Public Policy Coordinator for the ACLU’s National Prison Project, says:
Too many non-violent offenders are sent to prison because of deeply flawed sentencing policies, which are costing taxpayers millions of dollars and not addressing the heart of the problem. Programs such as the DIVERT court provide a sound, less costly alternative that has proved to be successful in reducing recidivism, and should be adopted in every city in the country.
Thanks to the "War on Drugs," incarceration of non-violent drug offenders has increased 1,100 percent since 1980; the current population of such offenders stands at nearly half a million. That’s almost a quarter of the current total national prison population.

Jag Davies, Policy Researcher for the ACLU’s Drug Law Reform Project, says:

We are at a remarkable moment in history that presents an opportunity for systemic change. The confluence of ballooning state prison populations, budget shortfalls, and a newfound political willingness to be “smart-on-crime,” are presenting unprecedented opportunities to halt the ever-increasing population of incarcerated drug law offenders. Most of these individuals have no history of violence or high-level drug selling activity, and do not belong in prison. With more humane and effective alternatives available, such as the DIVERT program in Texas, it is imperative that policymakers implement alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent drug offenders as soon as possible. State and local agencies carry the brunt of enforcing, prosecuting, and incarcerating drug offenders, yet it is also state and local budgets that are being squeezed tightest by the current economic downturn. Both fiscally and in terms of overall public safety, the U.S. can no longer afford the status quo.
Texas taxpayers should be gratified to know that their policymakers are looking for innovative, responsible ways to keep the prison population low, while still keeping the public safe. Diversion programs save both taxpayer money now and in the future, and benefits those who need it most.

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg!RedditDeliciousFacebook

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

3 Responses to “Texas’s DIVERT Court Saves Taxpayer Money, Keeps People Out of Prison”

  1. texas_libertarian Says:

    DIVERT is really a fantastic program. Although, this is just the beginning of reforming Texas’ horrendous criminal justice system. If all the states were to create a DIVERT-like system, it would save American taxpayers billions and help offset the effects of the Drug War. The ACLU and other criminal justice and drug policy reform organizations are doing a great job in challanging the status quo when it comes to issues like these.

  2. Peter C Says:

    “Rehabilitation” treatment is a valuable resource for those who genuinely want to change their behavior, but the practice of trying to forcibly “rehabilitate” those who are content with their lifestyle begins to look a lot like the practice—now fortunately less common—of trying to forcibly “rehabilitate” gays and lesbians. Such a practice, instead of acknowledging and accepting behavioral minorities, tries to effectively eliminate them by “normalizing” their behavior.

    Perhaps “rehabilitation” is a more economically efficient method than incarceration for eliminating behavioral minorities. What is needed, however, is not to make the elimination of behavioral minorities more efficient, but to take a moral stand for inclusiveness, against discrimination, to insist that behavioral minorities be accepted as full-fledged members of our society.

  3. Tomballpi Says:

    The government’s War on drugs is one of the biggest failures ever. Just another scam to justify the existance of another corrupt government agency.

Enter this code:

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map