You may remember that the ACLU is currently challenging the U.S. government’s exclusion of one of South Africa’s leading scholars and political commentators — Adam Habib a Deputy Vice Chancellor at the University of Johannesburg. In the fall of 2007, the State Department denied Professor Habib’s request for a U.S. visa based on the unfounded accusation that he had “engaged in terrorist activities.” To this day, the government has refused to explain or substantiate this claim, though we believe that Professor Habib — a long-time critic of the war in Iraq and other U.S. terrorism-related policies — is being excluded based solely on ideological grounds.
This week we were happy to see Professor Habib back in the news doing what he does best — offering measured, informed commentary on South African politics (in this instance, his views on President Mbeki’s resignation). It is heartening to see that the U.S. press (as well as the European and African press) has continued to seek out Professor Habib’s expertise despite the government’s baseless claims. Publications like The New York Times, the Washington Post and Newsweek have all featured quotes from Professor Habib recently, and their articles remind us of how much Americans have to gain by engaging with Professor Habib and other foreign scholars like him. (Listen to a podcast of Professor Habib commenting on his case.)
Sadly, the problem of ideological exclusion is much bigger than Professor Habib alone. We hope that under a new administration — whether Democratic or Republican — this shameful practice of excluding foreign scholars based on their political views will come to an abrupt end. A nation long heralded as the world’s leading defender of free expression debases itself when it treats words and ideas as their enemy.
Tags: constitutionvoter
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.